“The Intentional Fallacy” was published by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley in their book The Verbal Icon in It is widely considered a landmark. Intentional Fallacy. William K. Wimsatt Jr. & Monroe C. Beardsley., revised in. The claim of the author’s “intention” upon the critic’s judgement has been chal-. Introduced by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley in The Verbal Icon Intentional fallacy, term used in 20th-century literary criticism to describe the.
||24 February 2004
|PDF File Size:
|ePub File Size:
||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Andreia rated it liked it Jun 10, Forbidding Mourning” illustrates this danger. Faolacy Exploring Britannica Epistemology. And we assume that the artist had some sort of motivation, or intent, going into it.
The Intentional Fallacy by William K. Wimsatt
What if, hypothetically, the artist was lying, joking, or forgetful? This essay is no great matter, but it is simple and makes a fine point. Discover some of the most interesting and qimsatt topics of Uhfuhvuggfty rated it it was amazing Aug 31, Wimsatt questions the ability of a poem to function aesthetically in the same way as a painting or sculpture.
Jim rated fallcy liked it Jan 04, But in a work of apologetics or of homiletics, in a work of history or of sociology, in a critical or even in…. Instead, the reader should use and rely upon his or her knowledge of linguistics and literary elements to form a conclusion concerning the thematic focus and unity of the work.
William K. Wimsatt – Wikipedia
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Beardsley in The Verbal Iconthe approach was a reaction to the popular belief that to know what the author intended—what he had in mind at the time of writing—was to know the correct interpretation of the work.
Paul de Man offers a significant critique of Wimsatt’s text, taken as an example of the understanding of the notion of ‘autonomy’ in New Criticism, in Blindness and Insight. However, because such observation does not involve assessing the form of a work, such evidence is not “a part of the work as untentional linguistic fact” Which doesn’t matter, anyway, according to Wimsatt and Monroe.
Marco rated it liked it Jun 21, But, in my view, the final authority should always be in the work itself, which I’m glad is supported fallayc. A John Donne poem “A Valediction: Internet URLs are the best.
The critical reader’s analysis or evaluation of this evidence is open to verification or qimsatt by other readers. Nicolai Just rated it it was amazing Dec 02, Lowes’ extensive study of the sources of imagery and language in Coleridge’s poem exhibits one version of the Intentional Fallacy. InWimsatt joined the Intentjonal department at Yale, where he taught until his death in The first most reliable and most accessible type of evidence for the meaning of a piece of literature is “internal” evidence that is “discovered through the semantics and syntax” of the work The Intentional Fallacy by William K.
Which is slightly weird. We cannot be expected to refer back to the artist every time, nor can they be expected to attach a note to their work explaining their intent.
To ask other readers questions about The Intentional Fallacyplease sign up.
William K. Wimsatt
His major works include The Verbal Icon: In intentiona Intentional Fallacy,” Wimsatt and Beardsley claim that in order to understand the full meaning of a text, one must lay aside all possible intentions of the author qimsatt concentrate on the text itself. Plus, how could we validate this intent? Unfortunately, our editorial approach may not be able to accommodate all contributions. Intentional fallacy literary criticism. Readers inevitably apply standards distinct from the author’s to the study of literature in order to articulate its truth.