The LEFS is a self-report questionnaire. Patients answer the question “Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with:” in regards to twenty different. No difficulty: with usual work, housework or school activities; with usual hobbies, recreational or sporting activities; getting into or out of the bath; walking. Another questionnaire, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), with a version translated and validated for the Portuguese (LEFS-Brazil), has excellent.
||8 December 2008
|PDF File Size:
|ePub File Size:
||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Results – 1, individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. There was a higher correlation between the prognostic rating of change and the LEFS than lffs the prognostic rating of change and the SF physical function score. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of measurements obtained with the SF have been documented in diverse patient groups.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale. Close mobile search navigation Article qquestionnaire. Patients were placed in one of the following categories based on a review of documentation, which included diagnosis and the time since onset of condition or the time since surgery or cast removal: It was observed that, for a cutoff point of 48, the area under the curve was 0.
Furthermore, the influence of sex, age, type of employment, socioeconomic status, and history of lower extremity surgery on the LEFS were investigated. In light of this finding as well as the lffs ease of administering and scoring the LEFS, this scale appears to be a good choice for documenting lower-extremity function.
Accordingly, the scale development process took into account the barriers identified for clinical implementation of self-report measures.
The ISCD’s official positions updated The same question was posed to clinicians in terms of deterioration. Introduction Osteoarthritis OA is a chronic joint disease with a high prevalence in the elderly.
A specialist was responsible for the classification of these subjects in categories relating to the radiographic findings ; this professional was blinded to the analyzed outcomes.
The broad categories of orthopedic conditions in this group leds Another questionnaire, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale LEFS7 with a version translated and validated for the Portuguese LEFS-Brazil8 has excellent reliability and high internal consistency and is considered a reliable and easy instrument questionhaire be applied both for research and for the rehabilitation of patients with OA.
Free online Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) calculator – orthotoolkit
Three orthopedic physical therapists, each with at least 10 years of experience in orthopedic physical therapy practice, reviewed the 22 items and were given the opportunity to add additional items. The MCID is approximately 9 scale points. The objective of qquestionnaire Lower Extremity Functional Scale LEFS is to measure “patients’ initial function, ongoing progress, and outcome” for a wide range of lower-extremity conditions.
In the first approach, we used the prognostic ratings of change to separate patients into those who were predicted to undergo important change prognostic ratings of 2, 3, and 4 and those who were predicted to undergo no important change at 3 weeks prognostic ratings of 0 and 2. The LEFS was administered during the initial assessment to patients with lower-extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction referred for physical therapy. It may be noted that the LEFS questionnaire can be used as a method for assessing the progression and efficacy of treatment of OA, as it has two main properties of the instruments for functional status measurement 8: There is no strong evidence to suggest that existing condition-specific scales designed for the lower extremity are superior to the SF Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: Our goal was to develop a self-report condition-specific measure that would yield reliable and valid measurements and that would be appropriate for use as a clinical and research tool.
Each subscale score can vary from 0 towith higher scores representing more desirable health states. The area under the ROC curve associated with this value is. Pearson correlations and one-way analyses of variance were used to examine construct validity.
Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Reliability of the LEFS scores lefd also quantified using the standard error of measurement SEMa representation of measurement error expressed in the same units as the original measurement, in this case, LEFS points. Should the measurement properties be similar, a single generic measure or subscale of that measure could be used in place of a number of condition-specific measures.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) – Physiopedia
Initially, descriptive statistics were carried out to characterize the sample. The SF, however, is time-consuming to administer and score in the clinic and was not designed for individual patient decision making.
Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: The results of our study, in our opinion, provide evidence supporting the superiority of the LEFS over the SF for assessing lower-extremity function. Evaluation of functionality Two instruments to evaluate the functional status of elderly patients with OA were employed: The inclusion criteria were: Although there is evidence to demonstrate the applicability of the LEFS questionnaire in patients with OA of the knee and hip, there is a gap in the ability of the instrument to discriminate between different degrees of severity of osteoarthritis.
Whether short- or long-term goals are set that are just at or greater than the MDC and MCID for the LEFS will depend on the patient’s initial functional level, clinical history and findings, and time frames for the goals. Scoring is performed without the use of a calculator or computer and requires approximately 20 seconds. The short-term goal, therefore, could be: The patient’s score is tallied at the bottom of the page. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider.
The LEFS is easy to administer and score and is applicable to a wide range of disability levels and conditions and all lower-extremity sites. Ceiling and floor effects exist for a health status measure when patients often score at the extremes of normal function or severely restricted function. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: The results of the studies suggest that a correlation coefficient of approximately.
Further investigation is needed to document the measurement properties of the LEFS in patients with hip conditions and in other settings, including inpatient orthopedics. Men and women had similar median scores 78 and 76, respectivelyand younger individuals had better scores.
Going up or down 10 stairs about 1 flight of stairs.